Capterra API
Capterra

Capterra 评价 API

拉取任意产品的 Capterra 软件评价:总评分和分项评分、优缺点、评价者职位、公司规模和行业,以干净的 JSON 返回。

US$0.935/千条结果,按请求付费,无需订阅。

Slack Reviews 2026 - Capterra
capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/
capterra
Search for software…
Software CategoriesFor Vendors

Slack

4.7(3 reviews)
Visit Website

Slack Reviews

Theo Bramwell

Operations Manager · 51-200 employees

Sep 21, 2025

Transformed how our distributed team communicates

Channels keep conversations organized by project, and the search actually finds old messages fast. Integrations with our calendar and file storage save us a ton of context switching.

Notification settings take some tuning at first or you end up buried. Threads can still be easy to miss if you are not looking.

Adaeze Mfonobong

IT Director · 201-500 employees

Sep 16, 2025

Great for daily chat, pricey once you scale

Very reliable, clean interface, and the huggingface of integrations means it connects with basically every tool we already pay for.

Per seat pricing gets expensive once you cross a few hundred users, and some admin controls are locked behind the Enterprise Grid tier.

Nolan Fairweather

Marketing Lead · 11-50 employees

Sep 11, 2025

Simple, fast, and reliable every single day

It just works. Huddles replaced a lot of our quick video calls and the search bar has saved me more times than I can count.

The mobile app occasionally logs me out for no clear reason.

Capterra
API 返回的内容items[0]
{
"id": "cr-8834021",
"rating": 5,
"title": "Transformed how our distributed team communicates",
"pros": "Channels keep conversations organized by project, and the search actually finds old messages fast. Integrations with our calendar and file storage save us a ton of context switching.",
"cons": "Notification settings take some tuning at first or you end up buried. Threads can still be easy to miss if you are not looking.",
"comments": "We moved our whole 60 person company off email for internal chat two years ago and have never looked back. Onboarding new hires into the right channels is simple.",
"easeOfUseRating": 5,
"customerSupportRating": 4,
还有 21 个字段
}
可用率
94.29%
30d · 35 次调用
请求数
35
30d · 按周,近 12 周
响应时间
3.8s
中位数 · 30d

试一试

一个请求获取 Capterra 评价

requireFieldsarray
可选;省略时路由不变,由最便宜的数据源处理。列出本次请求必须能返回的输出字段,例如 `ownerResponse`,请求就只会由能返回全部这些字段的数据源处理。未列出的字段,只要处理请求的数据源有,仍会照常返回。这可能提高你的价格:最便宜的数据源无法返回某个列出的字段时,会改由更贵的数据源处理,并按它的价格报价和扣费。如果某条评价确实没有某个列出的字段,该字段仍可能缺失。如果列出的字段组合没有任何单一数据源能同时返回,请求会作为无效输入被拒绝,不扣费。
打开于
获取免费密钥
示例响应
免费运行只返回前 3 条结果。为密钥充值即可获得完整响应。
{
  "found": true,
  "data": {
    "items": [
      {
        "id": "cr-8834021",
        "rating": 5,
        "title": "Transformed how our distributed team communicates",
        "pros": "Channels keep conversations organized by project, and the search actually finds old messages fast. Integrations with our calendar and file storage save us a ton of context switching.",
        "cons": "Notification settings take some tuning at first or you end up buried. Threads can still be easy to miss if you are not looking.",
        "comments": "We moved our whole 60 person company off email for internal chat two years ago and have never looked back. Onboarding new hires into the right channels is simple.",
        "easeOfUseRating": 5,
        "customerSupportRating": 4,
        "functionalityRating": 5,
        "valueForMoneyRating": 4,
        "recommendationScore": 9,
        "author": "Theo Bramwell",
        "authorTitle": "Operations Manager",
        "authorCompanySize": "51-200 employees",
        "authorIndustry": "Computer Software",
        "timeUsedProduct": "2+ years",
        "validated": true,
        "verifiedLinkedIn": true,
        "anonymous": false,
        "incentivized": false,
        "reviewSource": "This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered.",
        "sourceSite": "Capterra",
        "alternativesConsidered": [
          {
            "id": "p-58562",
            "name": "Microsoft Teams",
            "slug": "microsoft-teams"
          }
        ],
        "switchedFrom": [
          {
            "id": "p-121",
            "name": "HipChat",
            "slug": "hipchat"
          }
        ],
        "switchingReasons": "HipChat was being sunset by Atlassian so we needed a replacement fast.",
        "chosenReasons": "Best app ecosystem and the team already used it informally.",
        "ownerResponse": "Thanks so much for the kind words, Theo! We are thrilled Slack has become central to how your team works.",
        "createdUtc": 1758412800,
        "productUrl": "https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/"
      },
      {
        "id": "cr-8834022",
        "rating": 4,
        "title": "Great for daily chat, pricey once you scale",
        "pros": "Very reliable, clean interface, and the huggingface of integrations means it connects with basically every tool we already pay for.",
        "cons": "Per seat pricing gets expensive once you cross a few hundred users, and some admin controls are locked behind the Enterprise Grid tier.",
        "comments": "We have used it for four years across two companies now. It is the default choice for a reason but budget for the cost as you grow.",
        "easeOfUseRating": 5,
        "customerSupportRating": 3,
        "functionalityRating": 4,
        "valueForMoneyRating": 3,
        "recommendationScore": 7,
        "author": "Adaeze Mfonobong",
        "authorTitle": "IT Director",
        "authorCompanySize": "201-500 employees",
        "authorIndustry": "Financial Services",
        "timeUsedProduct": "2+ years",
        "validated": true,
        "verifiedLinkedIn": false,
        "anonymous": false,
        "incentivized": false,
        "reviewSource": "This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered.",
        "sourceSite": "GetApp",
        "createdUtc": 1757980800,
        "productUrl": "https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/"
      },
      {
        "id": "cr-8834023",
        "rating": 5,
        "title": "Simple, fast, and reliable every single day",
        "pros": "It just works. Huddles replaced a lot of our quick video calls and the search bar has saved me more times than I can count.",
        "cons": "The mobile app occasionally logs me out for no clear reason.",
        "comments": "Our marketing team of 12 lives in Slack all day. Cannot imagine going back to email threads.",
        "easeOfUseRating": 5,
        "customerSupportRating": 5,
        "functionalityRating": 5,
        "valueForMoneyRating": 5,
        "recommendationScore": 10,
        "author": "Nolan Fairweather",
        "authorTitle": "Marketing Lead",
        "authorCompanySize": "11-50 employees",
        "authorIndustry": "Marketing and Advertising",
        "timeUsedProduct": "1-2 years",
        "validated": true,
        "verifiedLinkedIn": true,
        "anonymous": false,
        "incentivized": false,
        "sourceSite": "Software Advice",
        "createdUtc": 1757548800,
        "productUrl": "https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/"
      }
    ]
  }
}

完整的参数与响应参考:这个接口的每个字段、类型和示例。

参考

一个请求,一种响应结构。

你发送的每个字段和收到的每个字段,都附有真实示例。

最近验证于 2026-10-11 · 可用率和延迟按 30d 统计

请求体

JSON,POST 到这个接口。

  • productstring

    https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/

    Capterra 产品 URL,例如 https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/。Capterra 同时用数字 ID 和 slug 标识产品,因此需要完整 URL。

  • limitinteger

    25

    最多返回的评价数。最小值为 10,因为最便宜的 Capterra 评价数据源不处理更小的分页。按返回的结果数扣费,所以上限越低,费用越少。

  • requireFieldsarray

    可选;省略时路由不变,由最便宜的数据源处理。列出本次请求必须能返回的输出字段,例如 `ownerResponse`,请求就只会由能返回全部这些字段的数据源处理。未列出的字段,只要处理请求的数据源有,仍会照常返回。这可能提高你的价格:最便宜的数据源无法返回某个列出的字段时,会改由更贵的数据源处理,并按它的价格报价和扣费。如果某条评价确实没有某个列出的字段,该字段仍可能缺失。如果列出的字段组合没有任何单一数据源能同时返回,请求会作为无效输入被拒绝,不扣费。

  • sortByenum

    recent

    返回评价的排序方式:最新优先、最完整优先,或评分最高或最低优先。

你发送。 一个简短的 JSON 请求体。显示的值只是示例,请换成你自己的。
Capterra

响应

JSON,每个字段一个示例值。

  • foundboolean

    true

each itemdata.items[]
  • idstring

    cr-8834021

  • ratingnumber

    5

  • titlestring

    Transformed how our distributed team communicates

  • prosstring

    Channels keep conversations organized by project, and the search actually finds old messages fast. Integrations with our calendar and file storage save us a ton of context switching.

  • consstring

    Notification settings take some tuning at first or you end up buried. Threads can still be easy to miss if you are not looking.

  • commentsstring

    We moved our whole 60 person company off email for internal chat two years ago and have never looked back. Onboarding new hires into the right channels is simple.

  • easeOfUseRatingnumber

    5

  • customerSupportRatingnumber

    4

  • functionalityRatingnumber

    5

  • valueForMoneyRatingnumber

    4

  • recommendationScorenumber

    9

  • authorstring

    Theo Bramwell

  • authorTitlestring

    Operations Manager

  • authorCompanySizestring

    51-200 employees

  • authorIndustrystring

    Computer Software

  • timeUsedProductstring

    2+ years

  • validatedboolean

    true

  • verifiedLinkedInboolean

    true

  • anonymousboolean

    false

  • incentivizedboolean

    false

  • reviewSourcestring

    This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered.

  • sourceSitestring

    Capterra

  • switchingReasonsstring

    HipChat was being sunset by Atlassian so we needed a replacement fast.

  • chosenReasonsstring

    Best app ecosystem and the team already used it informally.

  • ownerResponsestring可设为必填

    Thanks so much for the kind words, Theo! We are thrilled Slack has become central to how your team works.

  • createdUtcnumber

    1758412800

  • productUrlstring

    https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/

each alternativesConsidereddata.items[].alternativesConsidered[]
  • idstring

    p-58562

  • namestring

    Microsoft Teams

  • slugstring

    microsoft-teams

each switchedFromdata.items[].switchedFrom[]
  • idstring

    p-121

  • namestring

    HipChat

  • slugstring

    hipchat

你收到。 字段有名称、有类型,无论哪个数据源响应,结构都一样。

常见问题

关于 Capterra 评价 API

AnyAPI 的 Capterra 评价 API 只需一次 POST 请求 /v1/run/capterra.reviews,就以统一格式的 JSON 返回 Capterra 数据。拉取任意产品的 Capterra 软件评价:总评分和分项评分、优缺点、评价者职位、公司规模和行业,以干净的 JSON 返回。AnyAPI 会在 2 个数据源之间路由每个请求,某个数据源失败时自动切换。费用:每千条结果 US$0.94,单次请求最多 US$0.0935,以美元计价,无需订阅,也没有每月最低消费。过去 30 天,通过 AnyAPI 发起的 Capterra 评价 API 调用中有 94.3% 成功,响应时间中位数为 3.8 秒,共测量 35 次调用。

费用:每千条结果 US$0.94,单次请求最多 US$0.0935,以美元计价,无需订阅,也没有每月最低消费。你只需为一个美元钱包充值,每次调用从中扣费。部分由钱包付费的失败请求会产生处理费用,我们按成本原价转嫁,不加价;错误响应会显示收取的金额。

拉取任意产品的 Capterra 软件评价:总评分和分项评分、优缺点、评价者职位、公司规模和行业,以干净的 JSON 返回。响应是统一格式的 JSON,外层结构与每个 AnyAPI 接口相同,所以解析另一个接口只需换一个 URL,别的都不用改。

过去 30 天,通过 AnyAPI 发起的 Capterra 评价 API 调用中有 94.3% 成功,响应时间中位数为 3.8 秒,共测量 35 次调用。这些是 AnyAPI 对经过网关的流量的自有测量,持续重新计算,并非公开承诺的服务等级目标。

可以。新的 AnyAPI 账户自带 US$0.10 免费余额,无需绑卡,至少足够调用 1 次 Capterra 评价,每次最多 US$0.0935。

AnyAPI 会在同一个请求中依次尝试它的 2 个数据源,从最便宜的开始,所以一个数据源宕机不会让你的调用失败。

向 https://api.getanyapi.com/v1/run/capterra.reviews 发送 POST 请求,在 “Authorization: Bearer” 请求头中放入你的 AnyAPI 密钥,并以 JSON 请求体传入参数。同一个密钥和同一个钱包适用于所有 AnyAPI 接口。

不需要。你向一个预付费的 AnyAPI 余额充值美元,每个请求从中扣费。没有月度套餐,也没有最低消费,同一个余额可用于所有 AnyAPI 接口。

有。TypeScript 用 npm 安装 @getanyapi/sdk,Python 用 pip 安装 getanyapi。两者都用同一个密钥调用所有 AnyAPI 接口,任何 HTTP 客户端也都可以。

可以。智能体可以连接 https://api.getanyapi.com/mcp 上的 AnyAPI MCP 服务器,或者向 https://api.getanyapi.com/agent/signup 发送一次无需认证的 POST 来创建自己的免费试用密钥,再通过 HTTP 调用这个接口。